In the early stages of the Starship program (formerly BFR), SpaceX initially intended to use advanced carbon fiber composites. However, in late 2018, Elon Musk announced a radical pivot to 304L stainless steel. To understand why, we must look at the specific thermal environments a spacecraft faces: the extreme cold of liquid oxygen/methane storage and the extreme heat of atmospheric reentry.

While carbon fiber is incredibly light, it has two major drawbacks for a rapid-iteration rocket:
In contrast, 304L stainless steel costs approximately 2.50 to 4.00 per kilogram, making it roughly 50 to 60 times cheaper than carbon fiber.
The “L” in 304L stands for Low Carbon (max 0.03%), which we have previously discussed as essential for welding. But for SpaceX, the most critical data point is the material’s behavior at cryogenic temperatures (-196℃).
Most metals become extremely brittle at liquid nitrogen or liquid oxygen temperatures—they shatter like glass upon impact. Austenitic stainless steels like 304L, however, actually become stronger and tougher as they get colder.
By using the fuel tanks (filled with sub-cooled propellants) as the primary structure, SpaceX leverages this “free” strength increase to offset the higher mass of steel.
The second reason SpaceX chose 304L stainless steel involves the “hot” side of the mission. When Starship enters Earth’s atmosphere, the leading edges face temperatures exceeding 1,400°C.
While aluminum-lithium alloys (used in the Falcon 9) lose structural integrity at around 150°C, 304L stainless steel can operate comfortably at temperatures up to 800°C before its yield strength drops significantly.
In the aerospace industry, “time is money.” Traditional rocket tanks are machined from giant blocks of aluminum or cured in massive autoclaves. 304L allows for a paradigm shift in manufacturing: The Water Tower Approach.
Starship is launched and landed at Boca Chica, Texas, a high-chloride coastal environment. As we analyzed in our previous study of 304L in coastal areas, the salt air is a constant threat.
However, because SpaceX uses 304L, they benefit from:

Interestingly, SpaceX initially experimented with 301 stainless steel, which has a higher work-hardening rate. However, they eventually moved toward a custom version of 304L.
While 301 is stronger when cold-rolled, 304L offers better weld-joint efficiency. In a rocket, the weakest point is usually the weld. Since 304L is less prone to carbide precipitation (sensitization), the “heat-affected zone” of the weld remains nearly as strong as the base metal, ensuring the tank doesn’t burst under the high pressure of the Raptor engines’ propellant feed.
| Grade | Yield Strength (20∘C) | Yield Strength (−196∘C) |
| Aluminum-Lithium (2195) | ~550 MPa | ~650 MPa |
| 304L Stainless Steel | ~250 MPa | ~550+ MPa |
While 2195 Aluminum is stronger at room temperature, 304L nearly closes the gap at cryogenic temperatures while maintaining much higher ductility.
The choice of 304L stainless steel for Starship is a masterclass in “first principles” engineering. By sacrificing the absolute lowest mass (carbon fiber), SpaceX gained:
SpaceX has proven that in the quest for Mars, the best material isn’t always the most exotic—it’s the one that allows you to fail fast, learn quickly, and build at scale.
LET’S SHARE SOME DETAILS